Venue: Members to access the meeting via Teams. Members of the press & public may listen to the live stream on the Council's website: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWKn8R24ZTbD3eaEJtq6bYw/featured. View directions
Contact: Committee Services
The Chairman welcomed everyone to the remote meeting, held under new regulations which came into effect on 4 April 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. She took Members through some general housekeeping issues, together with the etiquette for the meeting and then asked Officers present to introduce themselves.
This was followed by a roll call of all Members present.
To confirm the Minutes of the meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee held on 15 October 2020 (copy enclosed).
RESOLVED that the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 15 October 2020 be approved and confirmed.
Apologies for Absence
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors R P F Dewick and Mrs J L Fleming.
Disclosure of Interest
To disclose the existence and nature of any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests, other Pecuniary Interests or Non-Pecuniary Interests relating to items of business on the agenda having regard to paragraphs 6-8 inclusive of the Code of Conduct for Members.
(Members are reminded that they are also required to disclose any such interests as soon as they become aware should the need arise throughout the meeting).
There were none.
To receive the views of members of the public, of which prior notification in writing has been received (no later than noon on the Tuesday prior to the day of the meeting).
Should you wish to submit a question please complete the online form at:
There was none.
To consider the report of the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager (copy enclosed).
The Committee considered the report of the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager to establish an Overview and Scrutiny Committee Working Group (the Working Group).
The Chairman introduced the report and deferred to the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager to go through the detail.
The Manager informed the Committee that the report dealt with appointing to the working group who were responsible for:
She reminded Members that the committee agreed to these terms of reference for the working group at the previous meeting on 15 October 2020. Furthermore, although working groups are not politically balanced, a request was made after the terms were agreed to make it so. She then drew Members’ attention to section 3.4 of the report should members wish to appoint in this way.
It was then noted that given attendance levels it was not possible to appoint in a politically balanced way. Councillor Morris proposed that the Working Group be appointed in a non-politically balanced manner. This was seconded by Councillor Mayes. The Chairman put the proposal to the Committee and it was agreed by assent.
The Chairman nominated Councillor Mayes to the Working Group and this was seconded.
Councillor Mayes nominated Councillor Bell to the position of Chairman of the Working Group. This was seconded.
The Chairman nominated Councillor Morris, and this was seconded.
Councillor Mayes nominated Councillor Morley, and this was seconded.
The Chairman then put all the aforementioned nominations to the Committee and they were agreed by assent.
RESOLVED that the Working Group appointments were agreed as follows:
Councillor V J Bell – Chairman
Councillor C Mayes
Councillor C P Morley
Councillor C Morris
To consider the report of the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager, (copy enclosed).
The Committee considered the report of the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager that updated Members on process implementation and sought feedback that would help make further improvements.
The Chairman introduced the report and deferred to the Programmes, performance and Governance Manager to go through the detail.
The Manager informed the Committee that the report provided an update on the implementation of the working process agreed at the 15 October 2020 Committee.
Following agreement of the Overview and Scrutiny process and mechanism at that Committee meeting, an online form had been created and circulated to Members should they feel they have an item for Overview and Scrutiny. To date no submissions had been received.
She advised that preparation for the first working group meeting had taken place, as the Working Group would need to meet shortly after this Committee to allow for report deadlines. The intention was that the working group meetings would then provide a standing item report to be reviewed at the Committee meeting. She welcomed suggestions for moving forwards.
The Chairman moved the recommendation in the report that Members review and feedback on the information provided. This was seconded.
In response to questions raised regarding the scrutiny submission and approval process the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager (PPG) responded as follows:
· that the online form would be returned via the online link to the PPG Manager who would ensure it was submitted to the Working Group for review and approval;
· that all Members’ suggestions would be put forward to the Working Group irrespective of how they were received, through the form or by email etc.;
· that a response system was built into the process to advise Members whether their item was approved to be considered by the Committee or not;
· that there were no time limits on the process, that the schedule of meetings for the Working Group would be driven by the scrutiny submissions.
The Chairman reassured Members that one of the tasks of the Working Group was to ensure that this process was widely publicised and given the highest possible profile.
The Chairman put the recommendation to the Committee and it was agreed by assent.
RESOLVED that Members reviewed and fedback on the information provided. </AI6>
To consider the report of the Director of Strategy, Performance and Governance (copy enclosed).
The Committee considered the report of the Director of Strategy, Performance and Governance that reminded Members of the existing representatives on Liaison Committees and the new appointment to be made for the remainder of the municipal year, to May 2021.
The Chairman introduced the report and deferred to the Programmes, Performance and Governance Manager to present.
The Manager advised that there was one seat available on the Health, Overview and Scrutiny Committee at Essex County Council and that the report sought an appointment. She informed Members that although this was previously appointed to the Chairman, any committee member could be appointed to this seat.
The Chairman moved the recommendation in the report and this was seconded. She then called for nominations.
Councillor Mayes proposed that Councillor B S Beale be appointed to this Committee and this was duly seconded.
The Chairman put the proposal to the Committee and it was agreed by assent
RESOLVED that Councillor B S Beale be appointed to the Health, Overview and Scrutiny Committee at Essex County Council.
Any other items of business that the Chairman of the Committee decides are urgent
There being no further items of business the Chairman thanked all in attendance for their contributions and closed the meeting at 6.36 pm.