Issue - meetings

To consider the report of the Director of Service Delivery, (copy enclosed, Members’ Update to be circulated)*.

Following the Officer’s presentation, the Agent, Mr Cussen, addressed the Committee. The Chairman then opened the discussion.

Councillor M W Helm proposed to approve the application, contrary to the Officers recommendation, siting the following reasons: S1 - Sustainable growth, S8 - Settlement Boundaries and the Countryside and D1 - Design Quality and Built Environment, H7 – Agricultural and Essential Workers Accommodation and E4 - Agricultural and Rural Diversification. This was seconded by Councillor Mrs P A Channer. It was further noted that without this dwelling the applicant would not be able expand his business and needed to be onsite to look after the animals overnight. In addition, the applicant had submitted a draft Section 106 agreement with the application. Officers stated that in line with policy H7, the proper approach, if a scheme were to be supported, was for a temporary structure which can easily be removed. Furthermore, it was highlighted that the application was a change of use of the land to C3 (Residential) with a rural worker’s dwelling, which had future implications for the use of the land as a commercial/agricultural use,

A lengthy discussion took place, which included the inappropriate scale of the proposed building, specifically as there had been no change in the design from the previous refusal before committee, the improvement in the appearance of the site through the removal of the various outbuildings and the smaller footprint of the proposed building. The Chairman then put Councillor Helm’s proposal, to approve the application, contrary to the Officer’s recommendation with conditions, including an agricultural tie condition to the vote. It was also drawn to members attention that the decision would be subject to the confirmation of the submitted S106 agreement.

At this point and in accordance with Procedure Rule No. 13 (3), Councillor A S Fluker requested a recorded vote, this was duly seconded and the voting was as follows:

For the recommendation:

Councillors Mrs P A Channer, V J Bell, M W Helm and W Stamp, CC.

Against the recommendation:

Councillor N J Skeens.

Abstention:

Councillors R P F Dewick and A S Fluker.

As a result, the proposal was agreed.

RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to conditions and a S106 agreement, to be agreed by Officers in consultation with the Chairman.