Issue - meetings

To consider the report of the Monitoring Officer, (copy enclosed).

The Committee considered the report of the Monitoring Officer together with Appendix 1 that detailed the response to the consultation on the complaints process resulting in amendment to Article 7 of the Constitution. The Committee were asked to agree Recommendation to Council to approve the amendments to Appendix 1.

The Chairman introduced the report and deferred to the Lead Legal Specialist and Monitoring Officer to present the detail. He provided background to the report in that some Members had raised concerns regarding the Member complaints process and it was suggested by the Leader of the Council that an email consultation to canvass all Members’ views be undertaken. It was noted that the response from Members was set out at paragraph 3.1 of the report and the Monitoring Officer’s response to each of those was set out at a) to j) in paragraph 3.2 of the report. Those responses had resulted in a change to the Article 7 Complaints Process, which forms a part of the Constitution. Appendix 1 to the report outlined those tracked changes that the Committee were being asked to consider for recommendation to Council based on responses received.

There were a few other matters not included in the report that weren’t the subject of member comment during the consultation, firstly as shown at Appendix 1, Stage 1 paragraph 5 this had been changed to ‘Formal Investigation’ to remove the process of the Monitoring Officer (MO) referring an item to the Joint Standards Committee (JSC) to determine if it should be investigated and whether it should be external, as this was a matter for the MO to decide and not JSC. The other matter related to the inclusion of the ‘Public Interest Test’ as a footnote at the end of Appendix 1. This addition had been agreed by JSC in January 2021 and provided the criteria that informed whether an investigation take place or not. For transparency this was also available to the public.

The Chairman then opened the debate and a lengthy discussion took place.

An issue was raised regarding the application of political balance rules in respect of the JSC and the Monitoring Officer provided legal advice. Members then went on to discuss in detail the amendments as a result of the consultation together with further amendments as follows:-

·        That in respect of changes in Section 1 ‘Composition’, paragraph c) relating to seeking nominations from parishes/town councils Councillor Nunn proposed that an email be sent from Maldon District Council to all Parish Clerks asking for nominations by an agreed deadline, this to include the Terms of Reference for the Joint Standards Committee (JSC). Should nominations for representatives and substitutes not be forthcoming the fall-back position was to engage with the two respective Town Councils, Maldon Town Council and Burnham-on-Crouch Town Council. This was seconded by Councillor Siddall. The Chairman put the proposal to the Committee and it was agreed by assent.

In respect of the above agreed change it was noted that the Essex Association  ...  view the full minutes text for item 214